THE UK Government rejected the British Museum’s bid to appoint Professor Mary Beard as a trustee because of her pro-European views, it has emerged.
The classicist, 65, was turned down last year at the end of Theresa May’s premiership.
Whitehall sources said that the decision to reject her had been made because she had often aired pro-Remain views, The Observer newspaper said.
A source has since said that the classicist’s name was rejected because of her European stance.
The museum was reportedly told, when it asked why Beard had not been approved, that the UK Government did not appreciate her pro-European remarks, made on social media.
It is thought that the museum will still be able to appoint the professor and broadcaster, as trustees are able to appoint some members independently.
Sir John Tusa, a former trustee and former BBC World Service boss, told The Observer: “This is an absolute scandal.
“The trustees of the British Museum exist to protect its intellectual, academic and political independence...
“Will any Remainer now expect to be punished by the Government?”
The museum, which did not comment, is understood to be upset at the Government veto.
Beard told The Observer: “There are cock-ups and conspiracies.
“I’m not, however, going to diss Boris Johnson or the Department of Culture.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel