THE Scottish Government should issue Boris Johnson an Easter deadline to accept demands for indyref2, or start preparing plans for a ballot, a former depute leadership candidate has said.
Christopher McEleny, the leader of the SNP group on Inverclyde Council, said that if referendum powers are not transferred in the coming weeks, then it was "no longer sustainable to kick any discussion on a Plan B into the long grass".
In December, the Tory leader rejected a Section 30 order request for Holyrood to be handed the powers to hold a second vote, but the First Minister insists such a ballot can still take place in 2020.
McEleny, who drew up an independence Plan B with SNP MP Angus MacNeil, believes that if a Section 30 order has not been granted by Easter, a series of events should take place to discuss "alternative strategies".
A fresh proposal could then be put to the SNP conference in October, he added.
The councillor also wants the SNP to include a commitment in next year's Holyrood election manifesto that would allow for a consultative referendum to be held if a majority of MSPs elected next May back independence.
He is the latest figure in the party to push for an alternative route to indref2, with MPs Joanna Cherry and Kenny MacAskill having recently called on the Scottish Government to start making preparations for a consultative referendum.
READ MORE: Kenny MacAskill: Nicola Sturgeon 'never had a Plan B' for indyref2
McEleny said: "If the UK Government continues to refuse us our right to exercise democracy via an agreed referendum then we should rely on our own sovereign and democratic parliament to deliver that.
"If the Section 30 demand has not been acceded to by Easter then it is no longer sustainable to kick any discussion on a Plan B into the long grass."
He added: "It is clear that support is growing for countering the anti-democratic position of Boris Johnson and it's getting close to the end of the road for repeatedly saying we might have a referendum simply if we just keep asking nicely.
"Next year's Holyrood election should feature an SNP manifesto commitment that should Boris continue to refuse a Section 30 order then, by a majority of pro-independence Scottish seats the people of Scotland mandate the Scottish Government to hold a consultative referendum on Scottish independence, with a resulting Yes vote being a mandate for our government to then open independence negotiations with Westminster.
"Faced with that clearly stated proposition Boris Johnson may run off scared to the courts, he could well even reconsider his rhetoric on a Scottish referendum. If he does not, then so be it."
READ MORE: Poll reveals half of Scottish voters want indyref2 in five years
The Plan B approach, drawn up by McEleny and MacNeil, argued that a pro-independence majority in Scotland in either a Holyrood or Westminster election would be a mandate to open negotiations with the UK. But the pair failed in their bid to have the idea discussed at the gathering in Aberdeen in October.
An SNP spokeswoman said: "The SNP government has a cast-iron democratic mandate to hold an independence referendum – that is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact.
"Boris Johnson's anti-democratic actions are only helping to make the case for independence – and the more that the Tories try to block the right of the people of Scotland to choose their own future, the more support for a referendum, and for independence, will continue to rise."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel