RUSSIAN President Vladimir Putin considers the SNP to be a threat and will oppose Scottish independence, according to a former government foreign policy adviser.
International affairs analyst David Clark claims the SNP's success in forging closer links with the European Union and NATO has allegedly led to Putin's stance shifting.
Speaking to The Times, Clark said: “In 2014 the clear-cut strategic calculation for Russia was that independence would benefit their agenda of trying to prise apart western institutions and promote the break-up of Western countries.
“Scotland would not only be leaving the UK, but at least initially leaving Nato and the EU with question marks over how quickly they would be able to rejoin. After Brexit, the picture is more mixed. Independence would still have implications for UK defence, particularly Trident, but the purpose of independence now would be an act of reintegration to some extent, by rejoining the EU and seeking quick membership of Nato.
“What swings it is the clear position of the SNP leadership to strengthen the very institutions that Russia wants to try and weaken.”
Clark also claimed that the SNP were now a clear target for the Russian president, citing recent examples of Russia Today attempting to undermine SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald who has criticised Russia's influence in the media.
McDonald also warned the Yes movement to be wary of Russian trolls and bots attempting to influence the debate around independence.
Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of RT, claimed that McDonald was “haunted by the ghost of the Loch Ness Monster”.
In recent years RT has picked up many high-profile Scottish voices such as Alex Salmond and George Galloway to present its programming.
Tommy Sheridan is also involved.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel