SCOTLAND'S Justice Secretary has criticised budget airline Ryanair's chief executive after he called for profiling of Muslim men at airports.
Speaking to The Times Michael O'Leary justified the claim, saying "that is where the threat is coming from".
Suggesting that families with young children should be waved through airport security, O'Leary told the newspaper: "Who are the bombers? They are going to be single males travelling on their own. If you are travelling with a family of kids, on you go; the chances you are going to blow them all up is zero.
"You can't say stuff, because it's racism, but it will generally be males of a Muslim persuasion. Thirty years ago it was the Irish. If that is where the threat is coming from, deal with the threat."
However, in a tweet, Humza Yousaf took the opportunity to inform O'Leary on where he'd gone wrong. The Cabinet member pointed out that the "vast majority of those in Scotland's prisons on terror-related offences are white non-Muslim males".
He added that Muslim men are already checked enough in airports as things stand.
The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has also condemned O'Leary's comments, saying: "This is the very definition of Islamophobia."
Aye righto, because Muslim men DON'T get checked enough at airports. Awful from Michael O'Leary suggesting racial profiling to be introduced at airports.
— Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) February 22, 2020
As I said at Committee, vast majority of those in Scotland's prisons on Terror related offences are White non-Muslim males pic.twitter.com/S6irJ5uJGT
An MCB spokesperson went on: "Institutional discrimination against Muslims is well established: whether it is the ability to get a job, buy a flat or even getting car insurance. The challenges of #flyingwhilstMuslim are well documented across the globe," a spokesperson said.
"It is a shame that such racism is being expressed so openly, and that the CEO of a large airline would so want to discriminate against his customers so brazenly."
In the wide-ranging interview O'Leary also took aim at overweight passengers, calling them "monsters" who "may need to buy two seats".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here