THE Aberdeen bypass may be more efficient than anticipated when it comes to easing congestion in Scotland’s third-largest city, according to new data.
Opened on February 19 last year, the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR) was intended to cut traffic through the city, particularly HGVs.
A “data snapshot” has shown HGV congestion fell between 49% and 61% on the A92 artery – known as the A90 before the road opened – through Aberdeen, depending on the location surveyed, between January and June last year when compared with the same period in 2014. Initially, it was thought traffic would reduce by between 20% and 36%.
The project was a joint investment between Aberdeen City Council, Aberdeenshire Council and the Scottish Government.
Transport Secretary Michael Matheson said: “The AWPR’s first anniversary is a significant milestone and it is important to recognise the transformational effect this project has had on people’s daily lives in the north-east.
“In addition to the widely reported improvements to journey times for drivers using the AWPR, it is clear from the reduction in the proportion of HGVs on the A92 that businesses are benefitting from the option of a faster and more reliable route to and from the north-east. Equally, other road users and communities alike benefit greatly from HGVs transferring to the new road.”
Aberdeenshire Council leader Jim Gifford said: “These initial statistics echo the positive indications we’ve had from residents and businesses about reduced and more predictable journey times.
“The reduction in HGV traffic from rural routes is really being noticed, along with an overall reduction of traffic on the B-class network. We’re also hearing of increased visitor numbers to the likes of Stonehaven and Westhill as a result of the improved infrastructure.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel