NEW Chancellor Rishi Sunak may delay the date of next month's Budget in order to give himself more time to prepare, a senior minister has said.
Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said ministers had still not been told whether the Budget would go ahead on March 11 as planned after Sajid Javid's resignation.
"I know that the Budget plans are well advanced but I also know that Rishi Sunak, the new Chancellor may want time," Shapps told Sky News's Sophy Ridge On Sunday programme.
"I haven't heard whether the date of March is confirmed as yet. He is probably looking at it, I should think this week."
READ MORE: Kate Forbes joins devolved governments for urgent Budget talks
The delay to the UK Government’s Budget meant the Scottish Government was in the unusual position of setting out spending plans in its own budget without knowing exactly what money was coming to the country’s block grant through the Barnett formula.
Kate Forbes said the proposals contained in her Budget were based on promises of spending made by the Tory Government. This could lead to problems, if the UK Government didn’t live up to its promises.
Another delay is likely to lead to further uncertainty over the Scottish budget as a result.
Sunak, previously the Treasury chief secretary, was catapulted into the top job after Javid dramatically resigned in last week's Cabinet reshuffle.
It followed a series of well-publicised clashes between Javid and Boris Johnson's chief adviser Dominic Cummings, who was reportedly pressing for the Treasury to relax constraints on public spending.
Shapps however denied that Cummings was now "all powerful" in Whitehall.
He pointed to last week's decision to give the go ahead to the HS2 high speed rail link - a project Cummings was known to oppose.
"It is not the case that things necessarily go Dominic Cummings' way or anyone else's," he said. "Take HS2, a big decision that Dominic had views about, I had views about.
"We discussed it, we discussed our various views, and we came to a conclusion. The idea that just because Dominic thinks something, that's what happen is clearly not the case."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel