Funding for a proposed bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland should be sent to Holyrood and Stormont instead, Nicola Sturgeon has said.
Speaking at a conference in London to discuss the lead-up to the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow in November, the First Minister suggested the bridge would likely never be built – but said she would like to see how far Boris Johnson can get with the plans.
The Prime Minister said on Monday that work is under way to establish the feasibility of a road crossing between Portpatrick in Scotland and Larne in Northern Ireland.
Sturgeon raised questions about the section of the Irish Sea where the proposed bridge will cross, which is reportedly a major munitions dump.
She also said the administrations in Scotland and Northern Ireland could benefit in the immediate future from a portion of the £20 billion it would cost to build the crossing.
The First Minister said: "If you've got £20 billion available to build a bridge, I'm pretty sure me and I'm sure equally the First Minister of Northern Ireland would be able to find things to spend that on right now that actually would be really useful to accelerate the progress to net zero."
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Success of COP26 is vital for the climate
Addressing the Prime Minister directly, she added: "I'm happy to take the £20 billion, Boris, but maybe not spend it on your latest bridge."
Sturgeon brought up the scrapped Garden Bridge project, which gained traction during the PM's tenure as Mayor of London before being shelved.
Following her speech, in which the First Minister said the transition to a low-carbon economy could not "leave communities behind" in the same way as deindustrialisation had in the last century, she said: "I'm really ambitious about Scotland and our connections and our closest neighbours in the rest of the world.
"I think to say there are some big questions around the feasibility and deliverability of the suggested bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland would be an understatement.
"Far be it from me to point out that this would not be the first bridge that Boris Johnson has promised and failed to deliver so he has something of a track record.
"If he wants to prove that this can be done and its feasible and deliverable then let's see how far he can get with it."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel