THE number of patients forced to stay in hospital when they are medically well enough to leave has risen by 12% in a year – prompting calls for the Scottish Government to invest more cash in social care.
A hospital census carried out in December revealed 1379 people had their discharge delayed, including 400 who had been waiting six weeks or more to leave.
While the overall number was the lowest monthly total since April 2019, it was up from the 1236 recorded in the December 2018 census.
Official NHS statistics show that in the last month of 2019 delayed discharges meant patients spent a total of 45,404 days in hospital after they were well enough to leave.
This was a rise of 6% from the total number of delayed days recorded in December 2018.
Three-quarters (75%) of the 1199 patients who were delayed by three days or more in December 2019 were held up in hospital waiting for arrangements to be made for their ongoing health and social care.
READ MORE: Chairman of under-fire NHS Lothian health board resigns
Scottish Labour claimed delayed discharges have cost the Scottish Government £197.8 million since Jeane Freeman became Health Secretary in June 2018.
With Finance Secretary Derek Mackay due to unveil his draft budget later this week, Labour health spokeswoman Monica Lennon said cash must be found to allow councils to “prioritise social care and end delayed discharge once and for all”.
She said: “SNP ministers promised to end delayed discharge but it’s a promise they’ve broken over and over again. We can’t continue to do social care on the cheap. That’s why Scottish Labour is calling for a fair deal for local councils in this year’s budget, to put an end to the delayed discharge crisis that has cost our NHS hundreds of millions of pounds.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “People should not have to spend unnecessary time in hospital once treatment is complete.
“That is why we are investing more than £700m this year to support social care and integration – a 29% increase on last year. Progress has been made in reducing delays – bed days lost were down by 1% between the years 2016-17 and 2018-19.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here