Former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars has claimed that Nicola Sturgeon "willingly misled" SNP supporters who believed in a 2020 indyref.
Following Sturgeon's admission that indyref2 might not happen in 2020, Sillars called her out on her previous promises of an indyref2020.
In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, Sillars said: “Stripped of its fluff, Nicola Sturgeon's speech was a capitulation to reality – no indyref2 until there is an overwhelming demand for it, wait until Brexit is done and digested, no illegality, and a longish road ahead.
“She has been accused by those who marched up and down Scotland to her orders, as a 'betrayer.' The truth is they were willingly misled, and should have known that if you go to the top of the hill for an impossible purpose, you have to come back down with nothing.”
Following Boris Johnson's refusal to another Section 30 order, Sturgeon has placed emphasis on having a second referendum as soon as possible.
READ MORE: Johnson and Brussels clash over post-Brexit trade deal
With the necessary legal framework blocked, however, Sturgeon maintains that she wants a “legal, legitimate and agreed” referendum – something she admits may not happen in her proposed timeframe.
Sillars suggested that rather than independence, the SNP should instead focus on whether or not to “back or oppose and try to weaken the strong pre-negotiation stand taken by Boris Johnson”.
He said it was a “new opportunity for the SNP Westminster group to become relevant".
An SNP spokesperson said: “The people of Scotland voted overwhelmingly for an SNP manifesto committed to an independence referendum this year – that is the democratic mandate which should be respected and which Boris Johnson is running scared of.
READ MORE: Alyn Smith: More EU leaders will back Scottish re-entry
“We are being dragged out of the world's biggest single market against our will – becoming an equal, independent member of the EU will protect and build a more prosperous society. It's imperative that Scotland now has the right to choose that better future."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel