THE Scottish Conservative election campaign "lacked vision and ambition", a contender for the party's leadership has claimed.
Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Michelle Ballantyne claimed Tory activists spent most of their time on the doorstep railing against another independence referendum, instead of laying out their vision for Scotland.
She said her party spent more time talking about the Scottish constitution than the SNP, adding "voters knew what our party was against, but few of them knew what we were for".
The South Scotland MSP said that if she is elected leader ahead of rival Jackson Carlaw - who was in charge of the campaign for the December 12 poll north of the border - she will "end the policy vacuum".
She wrote: "We failed to put forward credible proposals for fixing the public services that have been grossly mismanaged by the SNP Government.
READ MORE: Jackson Carlaw pledges to scrap apprentice council tax
"We failed to give hard-working people a reason to vote for us beyond our commitment to safeguarding Scotland's place in the UK.
"Ordinary people do not care about flags or marches. They care about good schools, compassionate healthcare and safe communities.
"I am a proud unionist, but I did not get into politics to talk endlessly about the constitution.
"I am driven by the need to improve the lives of those around me. I know that Scottish Conservatives across the country share this drive."
Ballantyne went on to lay out five policies she would enact as leader, including reducing admin workload on teachers, recruiting 2000 more police officers, bringing income tax levels into line with the rest of the UK, cutting land tax for first-time homebuyers, and setting up early intervention schemes in deprived areas.
She is considered the outsider in the race for the Tory leadership, with Carlaw boasting the support of a majority of MSPs, all of the party's Scottish council leaders and a number of MPs - including former Scottish secretary David Mundell.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel