THE two men who were responsible for disrupting this week’s First Minister’s Questions are involved with a political party linked to the UVF.
Michael Woolger and Peter Morris, both from Penicuik, are connected to the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP).
Their Facebook pages are filled with loyalist material.
Woolger has subscribed to the Scottish Defence League and shared memes in support of English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson.
Yesterday, the PUP’s Scottish chief praised the two men and promised to “robustly act against any attempt to silence their voice in a Scotland under the SNP”.
The incident was seemingly sparked by recent criticism of the SNP’s John Mason.
The MSP said last week that he would aid constituents on “personal issues” but that he would not argue for things like remaining in the Union, lower taxes or the Orange Order’s right to stage marches just because a voter asked him to.
READ MORE: This is how YOU can help us persuade No voters this weekend!
The Scottish Tories wrote to Nicola Sturgeon asking that she consider expelling him from the SNP.
In March 2018, Mason apologised after saying that some people viewed the IRA as “freedom fighters”, not “Irish terrorists”.
During Thursday’s session in Holyrood, Woolger and Morris stood up in the public gallery – interrupting a question on food banks – to shout: “Brigadier Sturgeon, why do so many in your party support the IRA?
“Do you think that’s appropriate? Supporters of the IRA in a party in the administration of government?
“John Mason, the sectarian bigot, won’t support Unionists in society.
“How many support the IRA in your party, Nicola?
“John Mason called the IRA ‘freedom fighters’ but they won’t support Unionists. SNP-IRA.”
The two men were soon huckled out by police.
Both men declined to speak to The National, but one told Belfast’s New Letter he spoke out because of “alienation of Unionists” in Scotland.
The man, who has not been identified by the paper, claimed the sectarian divide in Scotland “is the exact same as it is in Northern Ireland with this political conflict”.
He added: “I have tried to speak to their MSPs but they won’t speak to us.
"Once they brand you a Unionist, they view you as toxic and won’t speak to you.
"They are alienating a whole section of the community.”
READ MORE: Angus Robertson: The Tories’ ignorance on Gaelic is shocking
Progressive Unionist chairman Sandy Nicol offered his support, saying many loyalists “feel frustrated that actions by politicians we consider to be persecution of the Unionist community are being ignored by the parties they are members of”.
He added: “We stand with those protesters from yesterday and will robustly act against any attempt to silence their voice in a Scotland under the SNP.”
The Progressive Unionist Party was formed in the 1970s to be the political wing of the paramilitary Ulster Volunteer Force. Their success peaked in the 90s and has waned significantly in recent years.
The Scottish constituency was established last year with the aim of fighting “the injustices and inequalities faced by the loyalist community” and to “destroy the SNP”.
It comes as hundreds of people are expected to take part in Republican and Loyalist parades this weekend.
Glasgow City Council say they expect around 200 people to attend a march this morning to remember those who lost their lives on Bloody Sunday.
It’s already been targeted by a far-right group called the National Defence League.
And this afternoon around 100 marchers will be in the city’s west end for the Apprentice Boys of Derry parade in Partick.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel