BREXIT could leave Scotland more at risk of a terrorist attack, a Brussels security chief has warned, just days before the UK leaves the EU.
In a briefing for Scottish journalists, a senior European source said Britain’s exit from the bloc, may lead to police and security services being frozen out of a top-level new Europe-wide database.
The SNP’s Joanna Cherry said that Scotland being forced out of the EU despite voting to remain would only benefit “those that are trying to escape the law.”
The Scottish Police Federation’s Calum Steele said it would be a “significant blow for the fight against cross-border crime.”
The “interoperability” programme brings together information from a number of other systems, linking border, visa and fingerprint databases for the first time.
It was created in the wake of the 2016 terrorist attack in Berlin when a 40-tonne truck was deliberately driven by a Daesh “soldier of the Islamic State” into a Christmas market in the city, killing 12 people and injuring 56.
The perpetrator Anis Amri’s use of at least 14 different aliases allowed him to slip through the cracks.
READ MORE: Brexit: Scotland snubbed in key talks as Northern Ireland has say
The new system allows border guards or police officers to simultaneously search multiple EU information systems to verify identity.
Ironically, the new system being introduced across the 27 remaining member states this year was masterminded by the last British commissioner to Europe, Julian King.
Speaking in Brussels, the EU chief said it was like a Prime Minister ordering a jet plane for his successor that they themselves would never get to use.
“There is no third country that has access to those databases,” the source said.
“There are third countries that are in Schengen that don’t have access to those databases.
“Now you never say never in anything, but certainly when the UK becomes a third country it’s not a question of just starting where you are now and taking a few things away.
“The negotiation works the other way around. It starts with nothing and builds upwards.”
READ MORE: MPs vote down Brexit Bill amendment calling for devolution assurances
“And so one of the things that you would need in order to be able to exchange any sort of information, which is possibly more important – well it’s important in trade as well as in security – is a data adequacy agreement with the EU, where the EU judges that the standards used to apply data protection etc are equivalent or whatever.
“And that’s your starting point before you get in anything.”
Cherry, who speaks for the SNP on justice, said: “Brexit jeopardises the close security arrangements we have with our EU partners.
“Any post-Brexit security measures are almost certain to be less effective than those Scotland currently has through our membership of the EU.”
She added: “As the SNP has repeatedly pointed out – the only people that will benefit from reduced access to European security arrangements will be those that are trying to escape the law.”
READ MORE: First Minister to press ahead with plans for indyref2020
Steele said: “The risk of loss of this access was one of the earliest risks identified by police officers when Brexit was first mooted.
“It’s disappointing but not altogether surprising that in amongst all the political grandstanding, the impact on policing and intelligence appears to have been neglected.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel