Turkey's parliament has authorised the deployment of troops to Libya to help the UN-backed government in Tripoli battle forces loyal to a rival government that is seeking to capture the capital.
Turkish politicians voted 325-184 at an emergency session in favour of a one-year mandate allowing the government to dispatch troops amid concerns that Turkish forces could aggravate the conflict in Libya and destabilise the region.
The Tripoli-based government of Libyan Prime Minister Fayez Sarraj has faced an offensive by the rival regime in the east and commander General Khalifa Hifter.
READ MORE: David Pratt: Road from 2011 revolution sees Libya on brink of civil war
The fighting has threatened to plunge Libya into violent chaos rivalling the 2011 conflict that ousted and killed longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said last month that Sarraj requested the Turkish deployment, after he and Sarraj signed a military deal that allows Ankara to dispatch military experts and personnel to Libya.
That deal, along with a separate agreement on maritime boundaries between Turkey and Libya, has drawn ire across the region and beyond.
Ankara says the deployment is vital for Turkey to safeguard its interests in Libya and in the eastern Mediterranean, where it finds itself increasingly isolated as Greece, Cyprus, Egypt and Israel have established exclusive economic zones paving the way for oil and gas exploration.
"A Libya whose legal government is under threat can spread instability to Turkey," ruling party legislator Ismet Yilmaz argued in defence of the motion.
"Those who shy away from taking steps on grounds that there is a risk will throw our children into a greater danger."
The government has not revealed details about the possible Turkish deployment.
The motion allows the government to decide on the scope, amount and timing of any mission by Turkish troops.
Turkish vice president Fuat Oktay told the state-run Anadolu Agency that Turkey would send "the necessary number (of troops) whenever there is a need".
But he also said Turkey would not dispatch its forces if Libya's rival government halts its offensive.
"If the other side adopts a different stance and says, 'OK, we are withdrawing, we are backing down', then why would we go?" Oktay said.
Turkey's main opposition party, CHP, had said its politicians would vote against the motion because the deployment would embroil Turkey in another conflict and make it a party to the further "shedding of Muslim blood".
READ MORE: 'Panic' as Turkey launches air strikes against Syrian Kurds
Before the vote, CHP leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu called on the government to work for the establishment of a United Nations peacekeeping force in Libya.
"Turkey must take the lead for efforts to establish stability in the region and concentrate all diplomatic efforts in that direction," Kilicdaroglu tweeted.
A centre-right opposition party also said its legislators would not back the motion.
"We cannot throw our soldiers in the line of fire of a civilian war that has nothing to do with our national security," said Aytun Ciray, a member of the opposition Good Party, during the parliamentary debate.
However, Erdogan's ruling party is in an alliance with a nationalist party, and the two held sufficient votes for the motion to pass.
Fighting around Tripoli escalated in recent weeks after Gen Hifter declared a "final" and decisive battle for the capital.
He has the backing of the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, as well as France and Russia, while the Tripoli-based government receives aid from Turkey, Qatar and Italy.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel