An SNP MP has said the likelihood of a second Scottish independence referendum in the short-term is likely to be "nil".
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said she wants to hold a ballot in the latter part of 2020 but Kenny MacAskill, elected as MP for East Lothian in December, said it is not likely and any extra time before such a vote is "no bad thing".
He made the comments in the forthcoming issue of the Scottish Left Review, as reported by the Herald.
The former Scottish justice secretary said: "The likelihood of a referendum in the short-term is slim. Indeed, more likely nil."
He suggested a more cautious approach to independence and "That additional time is no bad thing", following the 2014 referendum and to allow time to "restore the campaigning machine that was so effective back then".
READ MORE: Senior EU figure backs rapid re-entry for independent Scotland
Boris Johnson has stated his opposition to a second independence referendum but Scottish Secretary Alister Jack said the Prime Minister will give "careful consideration" to Sturgeon's request last month to be handed the powers to hold another ballot.
In his piece for the magazine, MacAskill called for those on the left of politics to unite following the Conservatives' re-election to office in December.
"We face an attack upon the social infrastructure of our country," he said.
"The welfare state and even the NHS are in (Boris) Johnson's sights, whatever pledges he has made.
"Far from rolling back the gig economy, it's likely to morph into something larger."
He added: "Bringing Scottish elected politicians and parties together is essential.
"Whether that's a constitutional convention as before, a convocation of elected parliamentarians from both chambers or a wider gathering can be discussed and agreed.
"Whoever calls it and whoever attends, it must be held soon. Building on the anger that currently exists rather than allowing despondency to settle in is required.
"It must address the high-level constitutional challenge and seek to create unity either behind independence or just the Scottish people's right to choose their own future.
"It can be the basis to show the world that it's not one party but the people who are demanding it."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel