IRAQ’S President has refused to designate the Iran-backed parliamentary bloc’s nominee for Prime Minister after he was rejected by anti-government protesters.
Barham Saleh said in a statement issued by his office he would not name the governor of the southern Basra province, Asaad al-Eidani, as the country’s next Prime Minister “to avoid more bloodshed and in order to safeguard civil peace”.
Al-Eidani’s name was proposed on Wednesday by the Fatah bloc, which includes leaders associated with the Iran-supported paramilitary Popular Mobilisation Forces.
He was promptly rejected by Iraqi protesters, who poured onto the streets to denounce his nomination over megaphones and to call for an independent candidate.
READ MORE: Two injured as avalanche hits Swiss ski trail
In his statement, Saleh said his refusal to designate al-Eidani could be construed as a violation of the constitution and that he was putting his resignation at the disposal of parliament. He stopped short of actually submitting his resignation.
The move is likely to further deepen a political crisis in the country, which has been gripped by mass protests since October 1.
Young, unemployed and unarmed protesters have led calls for a rehaul of a political system they say is endemically corrupt and serves foreign powers, especially Baghdad’s ally Tehran.
The protests, concentrated in Baghdad and the mostly Shiite-inhabited south, have also turned into an uprising against Iran’s political and military influence in the country.
Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi submitted his resignation late last month under mounting pressure from the protesters calling for him to go. He has remained in office in a caretaker capacity.
More than 450 people have been killed since October, the vast majority of them caught by security forces firing tear gas and live ammunition. Violence has hit the capital Baghdad, the southern city of Nasiriya, and the holy city of Najaf where security forces shot dead more than 60 people in a single incident last month.
According to Iraq’s constitution, the largest bloc in parliament is required to nominate the new Prime Minister, who then has to be designated by the President. A deadline to name a new Prime Minister has been missed twice over disagreements about which is the largest bloc in the parliament following last year’s elections.
READ MORE: Scots viewers outraged at Call the Midwife for Hebrides portrayal
There are two main blocs in the Iraqi Parliament – Sairoon, led by populist Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, and Fatah, headed by Hadi al-Amiri. But the numbers in the blocs have continued to change since last year’s elections, with an unknown number of lawmakers leaving some blocs and joining others.
Last Saturday, Iraq’s Federal Supreme Court provided guidance in a statement, but stopped short of naming the largest bloc.
It said the decision should be based on parliament’s first session after taking office last year. But the court also said it would accept if two or more lists had merged to become the largest bloc. The same day, Saleh sent the court’s response to parliament, asking the legislature to say which was the largest bloc.
Shortly after he issued his statement yesterday, Saleh left Baghdad and headed to his hometown in the northern city of Sulaimaniyah. A Facebook page linked to al-Sadr commented on the President’s position saying: “Thank you, Mr President, for rejecting the candidates that the people reject, a position that history, and the [Iraqi] people and the [Shiite religious] authority will record.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here