A $25 MILLION deal that would allow Harvey Weinstein to avoid paying any of his own money or admitting any guilt in nearly every sexual misconduct suit brought against him has been heavily criticised.
The exact terms of the deal remain uncertain, but $6.2m would be split between 18 of his alleged victims and his insurance company would foot the bill.
Louisette Geiss, a plaintiff in a Manhattan federal court class-action lawsuit, said it showed that people who “protect predators” will be held to account.
Others called the deal symptomatic of a “broken system that privileges powerful abusers at the expense of survivors”.
Lawyer Thomas Giuffra said: “The most troubling aspect of this settlement is a punitive provision designed to force victims to settle. Shockingly, any funds that would have been allocated to claims from the settlement fund for non-settling claimants would be turned over to Harvey and Robert Weinstein to defend against their claims in court.
READ MORE: The world of Epstein is a place where basic human decency dies
“We understand that many victims have been so emotionally devastated and drained by this process that they cannot go on. But this proposed settlement does not allow for a truly voluntary choice.”
Lawyers Douglas H Wigdor and Kevin Mintzer said they reject the notion that it was the best possible settlement, especially because it penalises those who continue their lawsuits.
They also called it “shameful that $12m of the settlement is going to the lawyers for the directors who we alleged enabled Harvey Weinstein”.
Lawyer Elizabeth Fegan said: “Harvey Weinstein stripped the survivors of everything – dignity, dreams, careers, and money. There is no amount of money that could restore what he took from the survivors. But a settlement will finally give the survivors a safe and confidential place in which to share their stories and receive the justice that the courts have withheld.”
Weinstein faces a trial on January 6 on rape and sexual assault charges to which he has pleaded not guilty.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel