NOBEL peace prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi has testified before the highest court of the UN, defending the military regime she was awarded the 1991 prize for campaigning against.
The African nation of Gambia, acting on behalf of a large group of Muslim countries, requested the International Court of Justice hearings and insists there is an ongoing and deliberate campaign of ethnic cleansing and genocide – including the killing of civilians, raping of women and torching of houses – that forced more than 700,000 Rohingya to flee to neighbouring Bangladesh.
Lawyer Paul Reicher said: “Everyone was a target and no-one was spared. Mothers, infants, pregnant women, the old and infirm. They all fell victim to this ruthless campaign.”
READ MORE: Plans to repatriate Rohingya Muslims to Myanmar are scrapped
Although Myanmar (Burma) denies the existence of any mass graves of Rohingyas, Reicher insisted that “at least” five had been found.
Suu Kyi said Gambia’s legal representatives had painted “an incomplete and misleading factual picture” of what happened in Burma’s northern Rakhine state in August 2017.
The Nobel laureate testified that the allegations of genocide and other crimes stemmed from “an internal armed conflict started by co-ordinated and comprehensive armed attacks ... to which [Burma’s] defence services responded” adding that the exodus of Rohingya was brought about by hostilities that their own side had initiated.
Gambia wants the UN court to take “all measures within its power to prevent all acts that amount to or contribute to the crime of genocide” and holds that Suu Kyi chose to ignore “unspeakable” crimes targeting Muslim civilians.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here