A STUDY has said Scottish independence could be accelerated by a post-Brexit trade deal between the UK and the US.
Academics at the University of Sussex have suggested a trade arrangement would likely require changes to UK domestic legislation in areas such as drug pricing and food regulation.
They also say it could create a "legal and policy vacuum" regarding the relationship between the UK's devolved nations and the extent to which they can influence UK trade negotiations.
In a paper produced by the UK Trade Policy Observatory (UKTPO) at the university, the academics - Chloe Anthony, Dr Emily Lydgate and Professor Erik Millstone - say the UK Government could be forced to choose between "facilitating trade with the US or holding on to the UK's fragile national identity".
Among the recommendations made by the group is a call to give the devolved nations a formal role in the setting of UK negotiating objects to ensure external trade arrangements do not lead to any internal trade barriers.
Replicating the EU's balance between devolution and harmonisation, with respect to UK-specific rules and bodies, is also put forward, along with a suggestion the UK Government introduces increased legislative assurances that it will not weaken current levels of protection.
Dr Emily Lydgate, a senior lecturer in Environmental Law and a UKTPO member, said: "A UK-US trade agreement would likely require changes to UK domestic legislation in very sensitive areas, including drug pricing and food safety regulation, which Scotland, with its large Remain-voting majority and stated desire to maintain alignment with EU regulation, would strenuously oppose.
"The UK Government may be forced to choose between facilitating trade with the US or holding on to the UK's fragile national identity.
"The destruction of the UK internal market - and potentially the union itself - seems too high a price to pay for a US free trade agreement."
The SNP's Ian Blackford said: "This is a stark warning that the Tories are likely to impose a trade deal on Scotland - we can't allow our NHS to be part of a trade deal with Donald Trump.
"Scotland needs to escape Brexit and lock Boris Johnson out of Downing Street - and only the SNP can beat the Tories in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel