SCOTLAND’S Information Commissioner has called for an end to the use of confidentiality clauses in contracts between public authorities and contractors.
Speaking to MSPs on Holyrood’s Public Audit Committee, Daren Fitzhenry suggested they are often being used as a reason to withhold something that has been requested under a freedom of information (FOI) request.
In written evidence to the committee, Fitzhenry proposed a ban on the clauses, instead encouraging the use of the commercial exemption if the release of information could be commercially sensitive.
READ MORE: Charity plea as one in 10 children face Christmas without warmth
He told MSPs: “Very often we can see that confidentiality clauses are inserted into contracts and they’re thereafter used in saying ‘well we can’t provide that information because we’re subject to this duty of confidentiality’.
“Quite apart from any commercial harm or having to look at the seriousness of the commercial harm, we’re looking at the confidentiality exemption rather than the serious harm exemption.
“So in practice, it’s one which, while we look at the issues of confidentiality and public interest in determining whether confidentiality exists and whether the right exists, it can be a block to providing information.”
He added: “If it’s included in the contract it makes it easier to exclude the provision of information. What we’re hoping to do is by removing that, we’re essentially saying well, if there is a commercial reason why you can’t provide the information, rely on the commercial exemption.”
SNP MSP Colin Beattie asked how a change in FOI legislation could work in practice legally, as well as asking whether it would be possible for Parliament to make such a change.
Fitzhenry replied: “Yes, in my view you certainly could do that. The Act of Parliament could say that this should not be a clause in future contracts and it can set aside what the limitations are.”
He added: “In my view, it would be open to the Parliament to decide to do that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel