A History of Britain Through Books, 1900-1964
Christopher Tugendhat
Whitefox, £18.99
Review by Alastair Mabbott
The past is open to interpretation in any number of ways. With hindsight, it’s easy for a historian to shape a narrative, making an outcome seem inevitable, by painting with broad strokes and crowding out opposing voices.
Take, as Christopher Tugendhat does here, the suffragettes, widely thought of nowadays as the spearhead of the early women’s movement. In their day, though, the mainly middle-class suffragettes were not universally liked among campaigners for women’s rights, and their headline-grabbing programme of civil disobedience has, for generations, drawn attention away from more significant advances made in the trade union movement.
That’s just one imbalance found by former European Commissioner Tugendhat as he studied the literature of Britain in the 20th Century up to 1964. The books of the time – like Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook, which “holds up a mirror to the age in which it was written” – challenge attempts at sweeping generalisations, presenting a much more nuanced picture of what the British thought of current events. Sometimes, like Lady Chatterley’s Lover or Samuel Butler’s 1903 classic The Way of All Flesh, books can mark the beginning of a new era and a cathartic shrugging-off of the old. Others, like some works by H.G. Wells and John Maynard Keynes, can predict the future with uncanny prescience.
The chapters in Tugendhat’s book cover several particular areas of significance: the passing of the Victorian era, the two World Wars, the Cold War, imperialism, provincial life, feminism, sex and race. A final miscellany draws together writings on the public school system, Elizabeth David’s pivotal book on Mediterranean cookery, Evelyn Waugh’s attitudes towards the press and the landed gentry and two contrasting takes on the Bright Young Things of the 1920s.
Britain’s status as an imperial power is a dominant theme, as is the shadow cast by two World Wars. From contemporary books we can see, for instance, how strong the pacifist movement was in the 1930s, with memories of the Great War still fresh. Far from being universally regarded as cowardly appeasement, Chamberlain’s desire to avert conflict was shared by a large number of people. And, although the strict separation of the classes remained largely intact throughout this period, working class voices, women’s voices and gay voices are straining to make themselves heard, a chorus of anger, resentment and the demand for recognition rising above a general thrum of complacency and colonialism. Tugendhat quotes passages that challenge the accepted version of British unity in the face of war, like Joe Lampton from John Braine’s Room at the Top, who was glad to be captured and made a PoW, and declares: “Let those rich bastards who have all the fun be heroes.”
Ranging from such popular favourites as Lord of the Flies, The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists and Nineteen Eighty-Four to weighty analyses like Maynard Keynes’ The Economic Consequences of the Peace, Tugendhat’s choices are always pertinent and thought-provoking. He guides us through a vivid and absorbing examination of 20th Century Britain, showing the seeds of a new age taking root in the soil of the old.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here