NATO’S secretary general has said the UK’s nuclear weapons are “important” in response to the Scottish Government’s desire to scrap the “deterrent”.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she would never use nuclear weapons and has called for the “immoral” and “ineffective” Trident nuclear system –based on the Clyde – to be scrapped.
Asked on The Andrew Marr Show whether Britain would still be a valued member of Nato without nuclear weapons, Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said: “Britain is a highly valued member of Nato for many reasons.
READ MORE: Charity says tourist tax could boost transport investment
“You spend more than 2% on defence, you provide a lot of valuable, high-end capabilities and you have shown again and again you are willing to deploy when needed.
“Part of the UK contribution to Nato is of course the UK nuclear weapons – the nuclear deterrent – which contributes to the overall nuclear deterrent of Nato, which is something that is important for Nato.”
The former Norwegian prime minister added: “Nato’s goal is a world without nuclear weapons but we have to arrive there through viable, balanced nuclear arms control and disarmament.
“The world will not be safer if Nato got rid of all its nuclear weapons while countries like Russia, China, North Korea and other countries maintain their nuclear weapons.”
Asked during the General Election campaign about her stance on the issue, Sturgeon said: “I think nuclear weapons are immoral, I think they’re ineffective and I think they’re a waste of money.
“I would not countenance their use and I look forward to the day where not just Scotland is free of nuclear weapons, but the world is free of nuclear weapons.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel