PROVIDING a basic income for Scottish citizens could help to vastly reduce poverty and allow people to fully participate in society, MSPs have heard.
A steering group has been set up to assess the feasibility of introducing pilots for a Citizens Basic Income (CBI).
The group has suggested introducing a CBI set at two levels, with a lower rate more closely aligned to the current level set for benefit payments.
A higher rate would be based on the minimum income standard produced by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. It has proposed £120.48, £213.59 and £195.90 a week for people aged up to 15-years-old, 16 years to pension age and above pension age respectively.
The second, lower, level of payment would be more closely aligned with current benefit entitlements. This would be £84.54, £57.90, £73.10 and £167.25 for those aged up to 19-years-old, those between 20 and 24-years-old, 25-years-old to pension age, and pension age respectively.
READ MORE: Kirsty Strickland: MSPs doing their day jobs is great ... unless you’re me!
Speaking at Holyrood’s Social Security Committee yesterday, Gerry McCartney, a consultant in public health medicine for NHS Health Scotland and part of the steering group, said the rate would help people to participate fully in society.
“It’s not just about being able to feed your family and clothe yourself, it’s also about the ability to participate in social activities and be a full member of society, which is quite a common definition of poverty,” he said.
“So by trying to peg the higher rate against the minimum income standard, we would hope to vastly reduce poverty if it were to be piloted or implemented.”
McCartney also told MSPs a pilot scheme could be used to assess the impact of CBI across different communities in Scotland, following recommendations made by the steering group in its interim report.
“One of the questions that has come up in the interim report is whether there would be interest in piloting in both an urban and a rural area, and in a deprived and a less deprived area,” he said.
“Obviously it would be possible to get a kind of compromise area with moderate levels of all of those different factors.
“But to get to community level effects, which is something we’re quite interested in – so this potential for volunteering and social capital and other factors to arise from a CBI being implemented – we would want natural communities to be part of the pilot.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel