A REPORT into alleged Russian interference in British politics should be published without delay, according to Nicola Sturgeon.
Scotland’s First Minister made the comments after Hillary Clinton said it was “inexplicable and shameful” the UK Government will not publish the report until after the General Election on December 12.
The document already has formal security clearance but does not yet have approval to be released.
During an election campaign visit to Blossom Tree Children’s Nursery in Edinburgh, Sturgeon said it is “unthinkable” people will not have the chance to read the report before casting their votes at the ballot box.
“I think it is essential that report is released to the public,” she said.
“I would 100% agree with the comments that Hillary Clinton has made around this.
“It is unthinkable that people across the UK would be asked to vote in this election before they’ve had the chance to see and read a report that’s sitting there that may, we don’t know what’s in it, but may talk about Russian interference in our election systems.
“Obviously, I don’t know what’s in that report, nobody that hasn’t seen it knows what’s in that report, but the more the UK Government appears to want to suppress it and not publish it, the more I think people will start to worry about what exactly it does say.
“It should be published and it should be published without delay.”
Although there has been no indication of the precise contents of the report, it will assess the threat posed by Moscow to the UK’s democratic processes following an 18-month inquiry into illicit Russian activities in Britain.
The Sunday Times previously claimed nine Russian business people who have donated money to the Conservative Party are named in the dossier.
UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps and a Downing Street spokesman have said the machinery of Government is the reason for the delay in publication.
Shapps said while he was not close to the report, the delay is “just the usual way that purdah works” and incumbent Governments are not allowed to publish anything controversial in the run-up to an election.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel