THE Liberal Democrats have launched a High Court challenge against ITV over the broadcaster’s exclusion of leader Jo Swinson from a televised debate.
ITV is hosting a head-to-head debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn on November 19 which will not include any other party leaders.
Party representatives lodged papers at the court in London on Monday and said it was “vital for our democracy” to have both sides of the Brexit debate included in TV debates during the election campaign.
Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice, party president Sal Brinton said: “General elections are about people’s democratic choices.
“The TV debates offer the only chance for people to see how leaders compare to each other directly, in a neutral, equal and balanced format.
“For many people, this is the moment they decide how they will vote.
“Right now, most voters see Brexit as the single biggest issue for the country and the central issue for this election.
“And people know more about where they stand on Brexit than which party they will vote for.
“So it is vital for our democracy to have both sides of the Brexit debate represented at the top table of the leaders’ debates.”
Brinton added: “ITV’s current proposal fundamentally disrespects the many millions of people who strongly support remaining in the European Union.
“It ignores their concerns, their right to question and to be represented.
“Both Johnson and Corbyn want Britain to leave. ITV’s proposal has no place for Remain at the top table, despite this being the strongly held view of many millions of both voters and viewers.
“In an independent YouGov poll, the British public, by two to one, think ITV should have invited Jo Swinson to take part.
“The Liberal Democrats, on behalf of all those who want our democracy to remain fair and balanced, are legally challenging ITV to do the right, fair and balanced thing.
“We need to preserve the health of our democracy, for this generation and the next.”
The BBC has also announced plans to host a head-to-head debate between the Labour and Conservative party leaders.
Asked whether the party will also take action against the BBC over its exclusion of Swinson, Brinton said it was “too early to say”.
She added: “It is the broadcasters’ duty to provide a fair and neutral debate which reflects the views of the country.”
Brinton also responded to a question about whether the SNP should be included by saying that Nicola Sturgeon would not be in the next Westminster government and that the issue is with UK-wide parties being represented in the debates.
The SNP said it is considering its own legal action over the TV debates.
The party’s business convener Kirsten Oswald said: “It is utterly outrageous for any broadcaster to include a minor party like the Liberal Democrats and to exclude the SNP – who secured nearly three times as many seats at the last election, and whose current support suggests will continue to be the third largest party in Westminster.
“We have made that clear to Sky, whose proposed debate is a democratic disgrace, and to ITV, and we are considering our next steps.
“In all of this, one thing that is clear is the utter hypocrisy of the LibDems, who are happy to see a larger female-led party of Remain excluded in their own self-interest as part of a typical Westminster stitch-up.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel