A HUNG parliament could be the best outcome for Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon claimed as she launched her party’s campaign for next month’s General Election.
The First Minister said neither Labour or the Tories winning an overall majority and SNP MPs being returned in great numbers would give voters in Scotland "significant influence and significant power".
Sturgeon ruled out forming a formal coalition with Jeremy Corbyn but said she would seek to form a progressive alliance to lock the Tories out of government.
She also expressed confidence that Labour would not stand in the way of an independence referendum.
Labour have repeatedly said there will no be pacts or coalitions or deals with the SNP and that Sturgeon and her MPs can either back Corbyn's legislative agenda or put Boris Johnson into government.
On Wednesday, speaking at his party's campaign launch, Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard said: "We’ve said that we are standing in this election to form a majority Labour government. If we were a minority Labour government we would draft a Queen’s Speech and it would then be up to the SNP whether they voted for that progressive, transformative Queen’s Speech or not. And if they did not vote for it, they would have to answer to the people of Scotland.”
At her campaign launch Sturgeon claimed the UK Labour leadership's refusal to admit they were interested in working with the SNP was their way of sparing the blushes of their Scottish chief.
Sturgeon said: “The reality is any minority Labour government that wanted to deliver any of its policies and sustain itself in government would need the support of the SNP, if the SNP is in the House of Commons, as I hope it will be, in numbers.
“That’s the reality of the situation and it gives the SNP - and by extension given that we’re there to represent Scotland - Scotland significant influence and significant power which is why the more SNP MPs there are after this election, the more influence we will have.”
Sturgeon also said her party would not “give its support to parties that do not recognise as a central principle the right of the people of Scotland to choose their own future.”
She added: “Whatever he might say to spare Richard Leonard’s blushes in the course of this election campaign, I’m not sure that’s a position that Jeremy Corbyn will find himself in.
“Jeremy Corbyn is somebody who supports self-determination for literally every other country in the world, it would be quite strange if he didn’t support it for Scotland. “
Asked if she would compromise on the timing of a second referendum, given that Labour have suggested they could allow one in the later years of a Corbyn administration, the First Minister said it was “not for Westminster politicians to determine” the timescale.
The First Minister said she was confident that she could still have a referendum before the end of next year, even if the Tories win a majority.
She said: "We already see the opposition of Westminster parties coming under pressure and starting to crumble.
"There is an opportunity in this election for the people of Scotland to really blow it away in numbers, making clear that whatever the view of the best future for Scotland, we are absolutely united in Scotland in believing it's for the people of Scotland to determine it."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel