THE SNP have accused Sky News of failing to meet their “statutory obligations as a broadcaster” over the decision to freeze the party out of their pre-election debates.
They’ve even threatened the channel with legal action.
Sky unveiled plans for a hustings programme with Boris Johnson, Jeremy Corbyn and Jo Swinson on November 28. The news channel only promised to “continue to provide appropriate coverage to other parties in broadcasts throughout the election period.”
READ MORE: READ: The SNP's letter of complaint to Sky News and Ofcom
In a letter to Sky’s head of news, John Ryley, the SNP’s business convener Kirsten Oswald said the omission of her party “fundamentally fails the electorate at what is a crucial time for the UK and critically, we believe, fails to meet your statutory obligations as a broadcaster.”
The former MP told Ryley it is “inexplicable that instead of inviting the SNP, the third largest party in the UK Parliament at the two most recent elections, you have instead invited one of Parliament’s smaller parties which at the last election secured only a third as many seats as the SNP”.
She described the proposal as “a democratic outrage that short-changes the whole of the UK”.
Oswald cited sections 5 and 6 of the Ofcom code which states that Sky are bound to ensure that “an appropriately wide range of significant views must be included and given due weight in each programme”.
She added: “If this fundamental issue of democracy is not resolved to our satisfaction, we reserve the right to test the matter in the courts.”
The First Minister herself was asked about the row during an interview on Sky yesterday morning. Nicola Sturgeon told Kay Burley that the decision was undemocratic.
Asked by Burley if she was “cross”, the First Minister replied: “I don’t want to personalise it, but I think all broadcasters really need to consider whether they’re reflecting politics as it is or as they’d like it to be.”
The FM added: “If I may say for Sky in particular who, to its great credit has been arguing for these decisions to be taken away from politicians, and arguing for an independent debates commission, something the SNP has supported, to take a decision on a debate that defies democracy.
“I think is particularly regrettable and I think the broadcasters have to take a long hard look at themselves, but to other party leaders, particularly to Corbyn and Johnson, what are you scared of in terms of having a real debate?
“Why are you so scared to have the SNP’s voice heard?
“To the broadcasters, reflect democracy as it is, do your jobs properly.
“And to the other party leaders, stop running scared.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon hits out a Sky's decision to omit SNP from debate
Scottish LibDem boss Willie Rennie said it was up to Sturgeon to make her own case for appearing on the debates. He said: “There’s no doubt the Liberal Democrats have had a big increase in support right across the United Kingdom.
“We are a party that’s standing right across the country so we’ve got a UK-wide platform.
“It’s up to Nicola to make her own case for that and I’m sure she’ll make that quite forcefully.
“But we’re doing our part in trying to make sure it’s not just the old boys’ network – two leave parties arguing against each other in the debate.”
ITV will host a head-to-head debate with Johnson and Corbyn.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel