THE SNP have called on the BBC to offer assurances that it will “get the party’s name correct in the future” – as the broadcaster was asked to explain “editorial judgements and basic errors” made in its weekend coverage.
The party delivered a letter to BBC senior management over failings in covering Nicola Sturgeon’s address to 20,000 people at our rally on Saturday, and after a reporter “referenced a fictitious political party”.
Scenes from the rally as it was ongoing on Saturday were only broadcast on the main BBC One news bulletins yesterday – with no mention that the footage or piece to camera was two days old.
“The Yes movement gathered en masse in George Square had one clear aim,” presenter Sarah Smith said.
On the Sunday evening bulletin, presenter Clive Myrie reported on Ian Blackford of “The Scottish Nationalists Party” saying the election would be a chance to provide another mandate for indyref2.
A report on fracking in the Saturday evening news also came in for criticism from the SNP.
The piece on the suspension of fracking in England made no mention of the fact it was already banned in Scotland – despite this being a UK news bulletin.
The party also accused the BBC of “jarring and minimising” the scenes from George Square, with the pictures accompanying a Sunday report only showing small sections of a march prior to it.
This came after the event was entirely omitted from the main evening and late bulletins on the BBC.
The letter asks: “There was no equivalent event of this scale held by any other party in the UK on Saturday, so a major news event in itself was wiped from the main coverage for what editorial reason?”
READ MORE: SNP write to BBC over 'basic errors' – including on party's name
The BBC News channel did cover the rally, but showed no images of the crowd during the event – they could only be seen leaving after the speech, behind a reporter on the scene.
On the choice of images, a BBC spokesperson in London told us: “This was a replay of an earlier live report from the protest and our reporter made it clear that thousands of people had attended the pro-independence rally, with organisers estimating around 20,000 people there and the police putting the figure closer to 10,000 people.
“We made it very clear in the report and in the live introduction that crowds had started to disperse following Nicola Sturgeon’s speech.”
The SNP’s letter concludes: “As we enter into a regulated election period I seek to understand these editorial judgements and basic errors.
“All assurances you can give me that the BBC will accurately and fairly build in the complexities of a devolved UK would be welcome.
“And if you can guarantee me that the BBC will at least get the SNP’s name correct from now on, all the better.”
SNP depute leader Keith Brown called on the broadcaster to up its game.
He said: “Viewers in Scotland should be able to expect so much better from the BBC.
“If the BBC are serious about trying to regain trust from audiences north of the Border then they need to get their act together immediately.”
An estimated 20,000 were in attendance at The National’s #indyref2020 Rally for Independence.
Speakers included First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, Scottish Greens leader Patrick Harvie and Valentina Servera Clavell of Young Scots for Independence.
The First Minister used her speech to stress the importance of a strong showing for the pro-independence party at the upcoming General Election to secure a fresh mandate for a new vote in 2020.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel