BORDER Force staff have revealed that Brexit uncertainty was responsible for the suspension of a partnership between Romanian police and Glasgow Airport in February.
Officers had been travelling to Scotland to deal with "high risk" flights from their country, a collaboration described in an inspection report as "extremely useful".
Romanians made up 91% of passengers last year whose safety was a cause for concern at the airport, but language issues had created problems for UK staff when gathering information.
The partnership came into effect in 2018 but was suspended in February, with the new report saying staff believed it was due to uncertainty over the EU withdrawal.
It said: "Inspectors were told that in February 2019, the arrangement with the Romanian police had been suspended.
"Staff believed that this was due to the uncertainty caused by Brexit, but the Glasgow SAMS (safeguarding and modern slavery) team was hopeful that it would recommence at some point."
The change in the working relationship was revealed in a report from the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, published on Thursday.
READ MORE: U-turn over Gaelic singer's visa after National highlights case
It recommends strategies that test for new or changing threats as well as targeting known "high-risk" flights are introduced.
Border Force at Glasgow Airport identified 121 potential safeguarding cases in 2018, according to the report, which was almost half the 2017 figure of 241.
A large number of low-cost flights from Eastern Europe, including from Romania, travel to the city.
The country is considered to be "high risk" by Border Force, in terms of the need for safeguarding.
Inspectors found officers having problems communicating and sometimes looked to other passengers to translate for them, which was described as "self-defeating" for identifying potential victims.
The introduction of Romanian police tackled the language barrier for staff but also meant they could offer support to passengers identified as vulnerable who needed to contact authorities in Romania.
It was also found to have improved the foreign force's intelligence and ability to prevent further cases.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here