THE First Minister defended criticism of lost NHS working hours by reminding the Scottish Labour leader that Scotland's health service would be "£758 million worse off" if Labour won the 2016 election.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard had claimed that more than 3.5 million working hours have been lost in the NHS through stress or mental health problems.
He said his party had obtained the statistics through freedom of information legislation, and called on the Scottish Government to better support NHS staff.
According to the Labour leader, who said staff are "being let down", the number made up 24.7% of all NHS absences last year and showed a rise in the proportion of mental health absences since 2014/15.
At First Minister's Questions, Leonard also raised an Audit Scotland report – released last week – which said the NHS is "running too hot", putting pressure on staff.
He asked First Minister Nicola Sturgeon what she plans to do about the problem.
READ MORE: David Nutt slams UK drugs policy as Scottish deaths soar
She said: "We will continue to support those who work in the NHS. Sickness absence in the NHS fluctuates, but it has remained fairly stable in the last few years.
"There are more people working in our National Health Service now than it was when this Government took office.
"We will continue, in tough times for the NHS ... to support our front-line staff in the essential work that they do."
The First Minister also claimed that if the Scottish Labour Party had won the 2016 Holyrood election, the NHS would be £758 million worse off in this financial year.
She added: "This Government will stand by our NHS staff, I'm not sure Labour would have."
Leonard asked the First Minister: "What does Scotland's National Health Service need? Another decade of cuts, prescribed by your own blueprint for independence. Or the £70 billion of investment in our public services that would result from the election of a Labour government?"
Sturgeon said the work being done by the Scottish Government on the NHS is resulting in improved performance.
She said: "It's only because there is an SNP Government in Scotland today that this NHS is the best performing in the UK."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here