SURVIVORS of the Grenfell Tower fire have welcomed a damning report that said London Fire Brigade (LFB) breached national guidelines through "gravely inadequate" preparation.
Sir Martin Moore-Bick said the absence of a plan to evacuate the tower was a "major omission" by the LFB and more lives could have been saved had the "stay-put" policy been abandoned sooner.
There was also an absence of training to help incident commanders recognise when this might be necessary, the inquiry judge said.
Bereaved family members said it was "heartbreaking" that more of their loved ones could have been saved, but some organisations questioned inquiry chairman Moore-Bick's assertion that evacuation would have been possible.
READ MORE: Timeline of events that formed ‘backbone’ of Grenfell Tower fire tragedy
READ MORE: Grenfell Tower cladding ‘principal’ reason for fire’s rapid spread – report
Some of his 46 recommendations require "urgent action" from the Government and others with responsibility for the "oversight and direction" of the emergency services, he said in a letter to the Prime Minister.
One of the groups representing bereaved and survivors, Grenfell United, welcomed the "strong" findings which "give us some confidence that our journey towards truth has finally begun".
LFB Commissioner Dany Cotton said many recommendations were welcome and would be "carefully and fully" considered by senior officers.
She said: "The report is focused on our response and it is right for our actions to be fully examined by the inquiry.
"We welcome the chairman's recognition of the courage, commitment and bravery of firefighters on the night, but we are disappointed at some of the criticism of individual staff members who were placed in completely unprecedented circumstances and faced the most unimaginable conditions while trying to save the lives of others.
"On the evacuation of Grenfell Tower, we note the chairman states he has received no expert evidence to guide him on reaching his conclusion and that a qualitative judgment on the brigade's approach might be better reserved for Phase 2."
Matt Wrack, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, said there was "no way of knowing if evacuation could have saved more lives".
He said: "We strongly refute the report's assertion that it would have been possible or safe to evacuate more than 150 people via a narrow, smoke-logged stairwell with just 30 firefighters.
"There is no evidence to suggest that this was possible."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here