BORIS Johnson wants to “shut the Scottish Parliament out” of the Brexit process, Scotland’s Brexit Secretary has warned.
In a letter to UK counterpart Stephen Barclay, Mike Russell sought clarification on the country’s role after comments from the Prime Minister on Wednesday. Johnson had told the SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford MP that Holyrood has “no role” in passing his Brexit deal.
According to a political convention in the devolution settlement, if the UK Government wants to rule on devolved matters it must seek consent from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. However this approval – known as a legislative consent motion – is not legally binding, meaning Westminster can go ahead without it.
Russell said he had received a letter from Brexit under-secretary James Duddridge on October 20 asking for Holyrood’s consent on the new deal.
Russell wrote: “During Prime Minister’s questions, Mr Johnson said, in response to Ian Blackford: ‘The Scottish Parliament has no role in approving this deal. On the contrary, it is up to the Members of this Parliament to approve the deal.’
“The UK Government has already conducted a power grab on the Scottish Parliament when it tore up established constitutional rules during the passage of the EU Withdrawal Act.
“For the first time since devolution was established the UK Government legislated for devolved matters and changed the powers of the Scottish Parliament without the consent of MSPs.
“Now the Prime Minister has gone further and, contrary to the letter from James Duddridge, appears to want to shut the Scottish Parliament out entirely from a process that clearly impacts in many ways on devolved policy areas.”
The Constitutional Relations Secretary added: “The idea of the United Kingdom as a partnership of equal nations has been a casualty of the Brexit process.
“The Scottish Parliament that so many people in Scotland voted for must not be cast aside in your Government’s pursuit of a Brexit that people in Scotland do not want.”
Meanwhile, Brexit uncertainty continued as Labour MPs indicated they would not back the Government’s plan to hold a snap General Election.
Johnson told Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to “man up” and support the proposals for a vote before Christmas as EU ambassadors confirmed an extension of Article 50 is now needed.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson will ignore Scottish Parliament on Brexit Bill vote
The former London mayor reiterated his offer to give MPs more time to consider his Brexit plan if they agree to an election on December 12 and added it was up to Corbyn to decide whether to get the deal done.
The PM also insisted the UK could still leave the EU on October 31 as planned, but that the fate was now in Brussels’ hands.
During his eighth visit to a hospital since becoming PM, Johnson told reporters in Milton Keynes that Labour was “split from top to bottom” on whether to hold an election.
“We have got Momentum, who are the Communists who back part of the Jeremy Corbyn enterprise, saying they want an election.
“And then you have got loads of MPs led by guys like Keir Starmer and Tom Watson who don’t seem to want an election ...
“Time for Corbyn – man up. Let’s have an election on December 12.”
Labour, whose votes will be needed if the PM is to get the two-thirds majority in the Commons required to go to the country, have said they will only back the plan if Johnson makes “absolutely clear” No Deal is off the table and a January extension is granted.
“I’ve said all along – take No Deal off the table, and we’ll have the election,” Corbyn told ITV’s This Morning.
But there are concerns in Whitehall that if ministers cannot get the Withdrawal Agreement Bill through now, they will be facing the prospect of yet another extension beyond January 31, with the possibility MPs could again take control of the Commons timetable to pass a “Benn Act Two”.
Under the Benn Act, the PM was forced to write to the EU requesting a delay after failing to win approval for his Brexit deal by the Saturday 19 deadline.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel