VIEWERS are concerned that the BBC gives too much coverage to "extreme" viewpoints and over how London-centric its output is, Ofcom has said.
The report found that BBC News was seen by some as "representing a white, middle-class and London-centric point of view that is not relevant to their lives".
It said "The BBC's heritage and longevity can inspire trust, but we also heard the BBC described as Westminster-focused and speaking for, and to, a small section of society.
READ MORE: Experts say BBC ‘misleading’ people on Scotland’s NHS in open letter
"Some viewers told us they see the BBC's television bulletins as stuffy and limited in range.
"The perceived lack of diversity in BBC reporters and presenters, or the lack of different viewpoints, was also raised by people from minority ethnic backgrounds."
The watchdog also found that viewers worried about the corporation's approach to impartiality, especially its inclusion of "controversial viewpoints".
Ofcom said its research showed viewers felt "extreme political views" were given "undue prominence" on the news agenda.
The results have been published in its second annual report into BBC News and current affairs.
However, Ofcom also said those most critical of the BBC over alleged bias tended to themselves hold the strongest political views.
READ MORE: BBC defends refusal to feature Sunday National in papers review
The report said: "When it came to content, audiences perceived the BBC as giving too much coverage to extreme voices while others criticised 'false equivalence' in its reporting.
"Those who were critical of the BBC's impartiality also tended to hold the strongest political views.
"The current polarised political climate presents a challenge to the BBC in how it approaches due impartiality."
The report said viewers also suggested more extreme views were given priority over more moderate or "typical" perspectives, and that they could sometimes go unchallenged.
In a letter to BBC Director-General Lord Tony Hall, Ofcom's chief executive Sharon White said some viewers had "concerns" about the BBC's coverage.
She said: "There were also concerns over aspects of the approach the BBC takes due to its impartiality in its news and current affairs coverage.
"Some audiences perceived the BBC gave too much coverage to extreme voices.
"Others highlight 'false equivalence' in reporting."The report favourably addressed BBC News' reputation as a trusted source.
Ofcom said the channel remained the UK's "primary source of news" for people looking for "rusted and accurate reporting" despite the uncertain political environment.
However, it warned that BBC News' handling of "reputational issues" such as the gender pay dispute had damaged its reputation among viewers.
The report added that young viewers were increasingly finding their news via social media and aggregator services.
It said that when people find their news this way their engagement is typically "fleeting" and that they usually only read a headline or brief paragraph before moving on.
The BBC said it welcomes the report's recognition of its "trusted, accurate news" service.
It said: "Ofcom notes that people's perceptions of due impartiality are often coloured by their own beliefs and that the BBC's unique status means we are subject to greater scrutiny than other news providers.
"As Ofcom points out, it has not upheld any complaint against the BBC on the grounds of impartiality. Being an impartial broadcaster means people will hear from a wide range of people, including views that they don't agree with, but we will continue to give different views their due weight so audiences have the context they need to understand what's happening in the world.
"We are committed to ensuring the BBC serves all audiences and reflects, and represents the whole of today's UK, and while we have made progress in reflecting this in our workforce we have been clear there is still more to do.
"As Ofcom has recognised, in today's digital world it's vital that the BBC engages with young audiences online, which is why we will continue to develop our offer for young people."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel