CAMPAIGNERS were celebrating yesterday after a landlord was ordered to repay £7500 to a tenant over a “sham” holiday let in Edinburgh.
Scotland’s tenants’ union Living Rent brought the case to a First-tier Tribunal and claimed that other landlords were using the loophole to avoid tighter regulations covering regular leases. It said the first victory of its kind set an important legal precedent that would “empower tenants to fight back”. Although the landlord had required the tenants to sign a “holiday let” lease, the tribunal said it was unenforceable.
The case related to the landlord’s failure to protect the tenants’ deposit on taking up the lease.
Under normal agreements, landlords are required by law to protect deposits in a third-party scheme, but in this case the landlord argued the lease was a holiday let and therefore he was not obliged to.
However, the court rejected this and fined him the maximum possible.
Earlier this year, Living Rent published a report claiming that many landlords were using such “sham” holiday let leases to avoid regulation and legal responsibilities.
Such agreements do not give tenants the same protection from eviction or deposit deductions, and the properties are not required to have the same health and safety regulations, like in houses of multiple occupation (HMO) licences. In addition, holiday let landlords are not required to register, which means that those struck off the landlord records could continue to rent properties as holiday lets.
READ MORE: No-Deal Brexit: Lucrative Scots potatoes risk losing EU trade
Gordon Maloney, who led the Living Rent action, said: “This case is an important victory for tenants and sets a clear precedent: landlords cannot simply pick and choose which laws apply to them, and no amount of coercing tenants into signing sham leases can change that. We know there are other landlords in Edinburgh doing the same thing, and this should be a warning to them that the gig is up.
“The whole case, however, underlines the urgent need for further regulation and clarity on holiday lets. People shouldn’t have to be experts on Scottish housing law in order to find somewhere safe to live, and it should not have required tenants to undertake ten months of legal action to get this verdict. If the government is serious about protecting tenants, they need to regulate and crack down on holiday lets now to avoid anything like this ever happening again.”
READ MORE: Calls for a Plan B do not equate to support for a UDI
Jac, a tenant in the Royston Terrace flat, added: “This case has clearly shown that many landlords will do anything in their power to avoid their responsibilities and disregard tenants’ rights. The choice to try and make this flat a ‘holiday-let’ was a very conscious choice by the landlord, who wasn’t even registered, to rip off tenants without having to face any legal repercussions. Luckily in our case, the landlord also under-estimated how powerful the tenants can be when they fight together.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel