A NO-DEAL Brexit risks taking the Union to "breaking point", a leading think tank has warned.
The Institute for Government (IFG) said that since Boris Johnson became Prime Minister, there has been a decline in engagement with the devolved governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
In a report, called No-Deal Brexit and the Union, the think tank said crashing out of the EU without a deal “would be a high stakes gamble with the future of the Union".
The authors said short-term No-Deal planning has diverted attention away from longer-term questions about the relationship between Westminster and devolved governments.
The IFG said meaningful and systematic engagement between the UK and devolved governments will be necessary for negotiations on future international agreements, including the UK-EU relationship and other trade deals.
"No Deal will mean no transition period, so these unresolved issues will need to be addressed urgently, in what will be an even more charged political atmosphere," the report said.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon insists Scotland must have indyref2 next year
The think tank warned a No-Deal Brexit will "increase the risks faced by the Union itself", adding: "In Northern Ireland, No Deal and direct rule would make a swift return to power sharing unlikely. Pressure for a border poll on the island of Ireland is likely to increase."
The report warns that a no-deal scenario will have "particularly severe consequences" for Northern Ireland.
It notes the Scottish government intends to hold a second independence referendum and states that a "modest" independence movement has developed in Wales.
The IFG said: "Brexit has put a strain on relations between the nations of the UK. A No-Deal departure from the EU could take it to breaking point.
"The Scottish and Welsh governments have felt increasingly sidelined since 2016 and, aside from the DUP, voices from Northern Ireland have been unrepresented in the Brexit process.
"While the devolved administrations have been vocal in their opposition to leaving the EU without a deal, the UK Government has committed to leaving the EU on the 31 October 'come what may'.
"This runs counter to the prime minister's commitment to strengthen the Union."
READ MORE: Plaid Cymru could push for joint independence referendum
IFG senior fellow Akash Paun said: "If the Union is to survive and prosper, people in all parts of the country need to be persuaded of the value of remaining within the UK. The UK Government needs a new strategy to make the positive case for the Union and improve its approach to working with the devolved governments."
IFG researcher Jess Sargeant said: "No Deal will make intergovernmental relationships much more challenging, but meaningful engagement between the UK and devolved governments will be necessary for negotiations on future international agreements.
"If the UK Government continues with the same approach it has taken to EU negotiations, the cracks in the Union are likely to widen."
A Government spokesman said the devolved administrations had been regularly updated on negotiations and readiness for Brexit.
"Our union is the most successful political and economic union in history and we have been clear that we will strengthen this once we leave the EU, setting us on a course for a brighter, better future," he added.
"We have made a fair and reasonable offer to the EU to allow us to leave with a deal and now it's time for the EU to show a willingness to compromise too. We will be ready for Brexit on October 31, with or without a deal, and without any further delay."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel