A SECOND Scottish independence referendum must not feature the "voter suppression initiatives" being put forward by Boris Johnson's Government, SNP depute leader Keith Brown said.
While he said independence supporters were "closer now than we have ever been" to achieving their goal, he warned of the impact it could have if voters had to produce ID when they turn up at polling stations.
In the Queen's Speech yesterday the UK Government outlined plans to require people to bring photographic proof of identity with them when they go to cast their ballot.
READ MORE: Watchdog warns ID plans will disenfranchise voters
Brown noted that legislation setting out the rules and regulations for future referendums in Scotland was currently going through Holyrood.
And he told the SNP conference: "I fervently hope that ... we do not have voter suppression initiatives being offered by the UK Government, we want to have the maximum turnout and eligibility to vote."
Brown used his speech to insist that the Scottish Government was seeking an "agreement" from Westminster over having a second independence vote, not "permission".
READ MORE: FM: UK has no right to deny Scots the right to choose their future
And he also stressed that "Scotland will not accept a Westminster veto on Scotland's right to choose".
The UK Government has to transfer power to Holyrood for a referendum to be legally binding - with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to ask for a Section 30 order to achieve this in a matter of weeks.
But Brown stated: "Just to be absolutely clear: We are not seeking permission for a referendum, we are seeking agreement for a referendum.
"And the reason we're doing that is not to please London, Westminster, however you want to term it. It is because we want to have a fair, clear choice for the people of Scotland and one that is respected in Scotland by both sides, one that is respected in London, and one that is respected internationally. That is why we have to have the gold standard.
"But we also have to be absolutely clear that Scotland will not accept a Westminster veto on Scotland's right to choose."
Brexit is convincing some voters who voted to stay in the UK in 2014 to back the SNP and independence, Brown added.
And he told the conference: "I am certain of this - and you can actually tangibly feel it now - that Scotland will soon take its place as an independent country."
He said: "Scotland is on a journey, a journey that has lasted many, many years, many decades.
"But it is now getting to the most exciting stage ever. It is clear that independence is not only on the horizon, but looming into view."
READ MORE: Scottish independence: Section 30 legal action 'cannot be ruled out'
This year's European elections - in which the SNP had its best ever result - saw "some incredible changes taking place", he claimed.
Brown said: "We saw a real shift, people who had never considered voting for the SNP or independence before now moving across.
"And that is the key thing we have to be aware of. We are on the cusp of moving people that have previously voted No to come across to Yes."
He said that was because people "felt appalled at the way Brexit was being carried out" and also "felt disgusted very often that their children were going to be denied the opportunities membership of the European Union brings".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here