A WOMAN who lost a challenge against a Home Office ruling that she is British by birth has vowed to continue her legal battle.
Emma DeSouza, from Northern Ireland, accused the Government of failing to honour the spirit of a commitment in the Good Friday Agreement that people from the region could identify as British, Irish or both.
DeSouza, who insists she is Irish and has never been British, claimed the Home Office's "hard-line" approach was an attempt to restrict access to EU entitlements in Northern Ireland post-Brexit.
The Home Office won an appeal today against an immigration tribunal case that had originally upheld DeSouza's right to declare herself as Irish, without first renouncing British citizenship.
The long-running wrangle centres on her application for a residence card for her US-born husband Jake.
After the Upper Tribunal ruling, DeSouza, from Magherafelt, Co Derry, pledged to take her case to the Court of Appeal in Belfast.
"After four years it's safe to say we won't be lying down anytime soon," she said.
"During that time we have had a lot of personal losses, we have lost family members, we have lost time with our families, we have lost opportunities, we have lost the first four years of our marriage, so we are certainly not going to go quietly into night with this decision – a decision that really goes against the spirit and purpose of the Good Friday Agreement."
In 2015, DeSouza made the residence card application identifying herself as an Irish citizen.
The Home Office rejected it on the grounds that it considered Ms DeSouza a British citizen.
Officials told her she could either reapply identifying herself as British, or renounce her UK citizenship and reapply as an Irish citizen.
The Co Derry woman argued that she never considered herself British, so how could she renounce citizenship she never had.
During the stand-off, the Home Office retained her husband's passport for two years – a move that forced him to quit a music band, as he could not tour, and prevented him from attending his grandmother's funeral in the US.
DeSouza took a legal challenge against the Home Office and won, with a judge at a First Tier Immigration Tribunal ruling in 2017 that she was an "Irish national only who has only ever been such".
The Home Office appealed against that decision at an Upper Tribunal hearing earlier this year. Those judges found in its favour.
Government lawyers argued that the British Nationality Act 1981 was the relevant legislation – not law flowing from the Good Friday Agreement.
They highlighted that the provisions on citizenship outlined in the agreement, which was struck between Stormont parties and the UK and Irish governments, had not been incorporated into the corresponding piece of domestic legislation linked to the peace treaty, the 1998 Northern Ireland Act.
The Government said the British Nationality Act ruled that anyone born in Northern Ireland was automatically British, until such time as they renounce that citizenship.
DeSouza accused the UK Government of failing to implement the provisions of the Good Friday Agreement into UK domestic law. She said her case will have implications for EU citizens post-Brexit.
"Brexit brings this into sharp focus because the automatic conferral of British citizenship on Irish citizens is being used as a way to restrict and remove their EU rights and entitlements," she said.
"This right that I am exercising is the right of an EU citizen - an Irish citizen in the United Kingdom – but with this automatic conferral of British citizenship we can't access that right, we also can't access things like the EU settlement scheme.
"So there are a lot of issues around how an Irish citizen in Northern Ireland will be able to access their EU rights and entitlements.
"In many ways you have to wonder if perhaps this hard-line approach from the British Government is so they can find a way to remove and restrict access to EU rights and entitlements in Northern Ireland, because no doubt it is complicated for them to deal with the fact that there are 1.8 million people in Northern Ireland with the birth right to Irish citizenship and, through that, EU rights and entitlements.
"And I believe a 'do or die' Brexit government is not interested in protecting the EU rights of people in Northern Ireland."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel