AN independent Scotland could take its place in the European Union “relatively comfortably and relatively quickly”, according to a leading law professor.
Edinburgh Law School professor Drew Scott said that there had been a change in attitudes in Brussels since the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.
And he dismissed previous suggestions that Spain could veto EU membership for an independent Scotland because of its stance on Catalonia.
Speaking at a fringe event on Europe at the SNP conference in Aberdeen, Professor Scott said: “The mood in Brussels today is quite different from the mood in Brussels in 2014 before the independence referendum.
“I don’t see this as a political point, it just is a fact of life that there is now a much higher degree of recognition that Scotland is a mainstream European country where 62% voted to Remain, and I suspect although it’s not been tested that would now be higher given what people see what the leave options are, that Scotland would take its place relatively quickly, relatively comfortably within the European family of nations and would continue to contribute as it has done.
“We don’t make enough in this country, and I mean Scotland now, of the contributions that we’ve actually added to the European project.”
Professor Scott continued: “I think Scotland could take its place relatively comfortably, relatively quickly providing we’re prepared to accept the obligations of membership and assuming we had achieved independence by a constitutional due process.
“The Spanish shadow is always raised but I think Spain’s position is quite clear, I think it always has been quite clear actually, that if Scotland becomes independent under a constitutional process which is accepted by all parts of the UK and all citizens of the UK, then Spain’s got no particular problem with that because it’s a quite different situation from that which exists within Spain.
“So I don’t see the shadow of a Spanish veto at all lying over this,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel