THE Scottish Government must give assurances that it will focus its spending on low-carbon projects as part of attempts to tackle the climate emergency, Holyrood’s Environment Committee has said.
Calling for assurances that the Government will prioritise low carbon and carbon neutral projects across all departments’ spending, the committee adds that MSPs are “concerned” about the lack of detail in a key financial document.
While acknowledging the Scottish Government’s “strong commitment” to address the climate crisis by setting a net-zero emissions target by 2045, the report by the Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee warned that infrastructure projects should be chosen on the basis of their environmental impact.
The pre-budget scrutiny report states: “In the context of the climate emergency, the committee considers that Scotland needs to ‘lock in’ the transition to a zero-carbon future now.
“This will require a substantial shift in the proportion of investment that is spent on infrastructure that does not contribute negatively to climate change.”
The committee has previously called on the Government to publish “an indication of the cumulative carbon impact” of its revenue and capital spending – something it is claimed did not happen in the latest report from May.
Committee convenor Gillian Martin MSP said: “A climate emergency has been declared and Scotland has committed to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2045.
“To do this it is essential that the Scottish Government prioritises funding now for low carbon and carbon neutral action and ensures spending does not ‘lock in’ carbon emissions for years to come.
“We need to significantly step up to the climate and ecological crisis and make sure we increase our investment in natural capital, biodiversity and climate change action.
“There are huge opportunities for early action and significant potential costs of inaction or delayed action.”
Concerns were also raised about the failure of the Government’s Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) to include information about the carbon impact of projects getting funding, with the report stating: “The MTFS contains no detail on Scottish Government spending priorities or plans.”
The committee’s recommendations came as it was revealed UK renewables generated more electricity than fossil fuel power plants over the past three months.
The months of July, August and September were the first quarterly period in which renewables outpaced fossil fuels since the UK’s first public power station opened in 1882, climate website Carbon Brief said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here