I LIKE the not proven verdict. Historically Scottish jurors pronounced verdicts of proven and not proven. Guilty and not guilty became more common but the not proven verdict lingered on. In modern times the not proven verdict has a different meaning.
READ MORE: Justice Secretary scrutinising Scotland's 'not proven' verdict
Presently, with this verdict the jury have the choice of saying, in effect, “we think you are guilty but the prosecution has not produced enough evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt”. It does not mean the accused is guiltless, even though he or she may go free. To victims or the families of victims a not proven verdict is far preferable in the event of the failure of the prosecution than a not guilty verdict.
Mike Herd
Highland
THE essential verdicts should revert to being proven and not proven. This makes it clear that it is the prosecutor’s job to prove the case, and not for the accused to prove otherwise. This different wording from that commonly used in the dramatic arts may also focus attention on evidence and logic rather than being swayed by rhetoric and performance.
Ray H
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel