THE SNP has stepped up planning for an indyref2 vote next year, promising to deliver a new report on how independence can “end poverty, tackle inequality and improve the lives of families across Scotland” in time for an autumn campaign.
Nicola Sturgeon is expected to request powers for a second referendum before the end of the year and has said that she wants a vote in the second half of next year.
The Scottish Government is currently steering a Referendums Bill through Holyrood.
Yesterday it was revealed that former health secretary Shona Robison has been appointed to chair the party’s new Social Justice and Fairness Commission.
Sturgeon announced the forming of the body at the SNP spring conference earlier this year, telling delegates that its role would be to show how independence from the UK could reduce poverty and inequality in Scotland.
In her closing speech, the First Minister said the commission would show how the proceeds of economic growth under independence could be shared “much more fairly”.
READ MORE: New system has dignity, respect and fairness at its heart
The party body was also seen as an attempt to rebut some of the criticism of Andrew Wilson’s Growth Commission report. Both political opponents – and a fair number of party members – had attacked Wilson’s calls for tighter spending controls to bring down the deficit after independence.
Labour repeatedly describes the Growth Commission as a “cuts commission” which would lead to “a decade of unprecedented austerity”.
Members of the new commission will include retired Scottish chief medical officer Professor Sir Harry Burns, activist and campaigner Chelsea Cameron, former convener of the Scottish Women’s Budget Group Dr Angela O’Hagan and Govan Law Centre principal solicitor and ex-Labour campaigner Mike Dailly (below).
Robison told The National that the commission would “explore in detail how we can use the powers of independence to end poverty, tackle inequality and improve the lives of families across Scotland”.
She added: “That’s a crucial task – both for persuading people of the case for independence, and for building a better country once we achieve it.”
The SNP said the commission would be expected to produce a report in time for the proposals to form part of an autumn 2020 referendum campaign.
Meanwhile, Downing Street has been accused of being “too complacent” about a second independence referendum.
A senior Whitehall official told the Scotsman about a lack of “panic” at the most senior levels over the strengthening trend in polling on Scottish independence.
A dossier of Scottish coverage of the Ashcroft opinion poll – conducted in the wake of Johnson’s first visit as Prime Minister to Scotland showing independence in the lead for the first time in two and a half years – was sent to Number 10 by former Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson.
Asked if there was panic in Downing Street, the paper’s source said: “There isn’t nearly enough panic.”
The paper also said Johnson had come to an agreement with Scottish Tories not to comment on what conditions would “trigger” permission for a second independence referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel