THE Scottish Government has confirmed its "final policy position" on fracking as being one of no support.
In a statement to the Scottish Parliament earlier today, Energy Minister Paul Wheelhouse said the Government does not support the controversial practice but feels an outright ban is "not necessary at this time".
A moratorium has been in place since 2017 on unconventional oil and gas extraction.
Wheelhouse said: "There has been a change in public perception to the climate crisis and the expectations on governments to respond.
"We have considered evidence gathered from a range of independent experts, undertaken the necessary statutory assessments and ensured that people in industry across Scotland have had the opportunity to participate in the policy-making process.
"We've undertaken the most far-reaching investigations into unconventional oil and gas by any government anywhere in the world.
"This means that I am now able to confirm the final policy position, a policy that is informed by facts, evidence and analysis, as well as public views.
"Ministers have concluded that an unconventional oil and gas industry would not be of sufficient positive benefit to Scotland to outweigh its negative impact."
READ MORE: Fracking can and should be banned in Scotland, leading QC says
Wheelhouse went on to explain how the position would work in practice.
Energy companies in Scotland need licences and planning permission to begin fracking, and Wheelhouse said the Scottish Government will ensure these are not provided.
He said: "The finalised policy of no support enables us to set a framework for the exercise of planning and licensing functions.
"As a result of our decision, fracking can only happen if licences are issued, and we do not intend to issue any licences which would allow fracking.
"To put this into immediate effect, the chief planner has today written to planning authorities across Scotland, stating our finalised policy and confirming that a new direction is being issued in respect of this policy."
Opposition parties have called for an outright ban on the practice, something Wheelhouse said is unnecessary, however, he did say it could happen in the future.
He said: "We do not consider that new legislation is necessary at this time to control unconventional oil and gas development in Scotland.
"A strong policy position, enacted through devolved planning powers and licensing is, we believe, robust, evidence-led and sufficient.
"However, that option remains open if there is evidence over time that further action is required."
READ MORE: In a broad movement like ours we will never all agree on strategy
Scottish Labour energy spokeswoman Claudia Beamish said: "Onshore fracking is not a transition fuel, but a toxic new industry - as proven in England and across the globe.
"No doubt Ineos and the whole industry will finally grasp the message loud and clear: no fracking here.
"Crucially though, this is not a legal ban, which is what my Member's Bill could deliver.
"While I welcome the Scottish Government's no-support policy position today, and the robust evidence underpinning it, I seek assurance from the minister on how its safety will be secured from future governments or whims of future ministers."
Wheelhouse said when the Scottish Government's National Planning Framework is brought into force, "no government will be able to change the National Planning Framework to support unconventional oil and gas without the backing of a majority in this Parliament".
But Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Alexander Burnett called the final position a "fudge", claiming it shows the "hypocrisy of the SNP".
He added: "The minister talks of lowering our reliance on imported fossil fuels when today's actions fails to recognise the tens of thousands of barrels of shale gas imported daily from across the Atlantic.
"So it appears the SNP support fracking when they do not think it could cost them votes."
Wheelhouse responded: "This Government can only control the environmental conditions that apply in Scotland.
"Product which is sourced from outside Scotland is neither a matter for us in terms of trade - we don't have the powers over trade - and we don't have the powers over jurisdictions elsewhere such as the United States."
The updated position of the Scottish Government was inadvertently posted on its website on Wednesday, 24 hours before the statement was made, in what was described as a "clerical error".
Wheelhouse apologised for the mistake and said steps had been taken to ensure it would not be repeated.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel