APES understand what others see and believe, a skill previously believed to be unique to humans, according to new research from the University of St Andrews.
An international team of researchers, including Dr Christopher Krupenye and Dr Josep Call from St Andrews and colleagues from the Kyoto University in Japan, studied apes to see if they, like humans, possess a theory of mind – the ability to attribute mental states, like desires and beliefs, to oneself and others.
Theory of mind is critical to human social life as human beings consider others’ goals, knowledge and beliefs when we co-operate or compete, communicate or teach. Now there is evidence that apes can also project their inner experiences to understand others’ states of mind. The study, published yesterday in PNAS, challenges a long-standing hypothesis that apes can only respond to cues of others’ behaviour rather than truly understand what others can see and believe.
Krupenye, of the School of Psychology and Neuroscience at St Andrews, said: “This is an important advance in our effort to determine how richly our closest relatives can understand others’ perspectives.”
The researchers showed chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans videos of a human being dressed as a gorilla hiding objects behind an unusual barrier from a human actor. They tracked the animals eye movements to see if they understood how others see the world when the viewpoint differs from their own.
The key finding of the study was that how the apes experienced the barrier themselves is how they expected the actor to experience it. If they experienced it as opaque, they expected the actor to behave as though he hadn’t seen through it either and if they experienced the barrier as translucent they anticipated that the actor would also be able to see through it.
The study showed apes can successfully predict that an actor will search for an object where he has last seen it (and believes it to be), even if the apes know it is no longer there (it was removed while the actor was behind the barrier).
Call said: “This study suggests that apes consult their own past perceptual experience to understand the actor’s perspective and predict his subsequent actions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here