AN overwhelming majority of professional recruitment companies are concerned about the prospect of a No-Deal Brexit, according to new research from the Association of Professional Staffing Companies (APSCo).
A survey of the trade association’s membership revealed that 87% of the professional recruitment firms polled are concerned about the implications should freedom of movement end in a No-Deal scenario. This is despite the fact that individuals from the EU will now have until at least December 2020 to apply for pre-settled or settled status.
In addition, when the same group were asked if they expect a No-Deal Brexit to have an immediate and significant impact on access to talent, over half (58%) said “yes”. When quizzed on whether they believe there is sufficient access to clear guidance on the EU Settlement Scheme a Home Office initiative designed to provide EU citizens and their families with a route to living and working in the UK after the country leaves the bloc, 55% said “no”.
On the findings, Tania Bowers, legal counsel at APSCo, said: “It is unsurprising that the professional recruitment sector is worried about how the current political turmoil may impact access to talent in Britain and the rights of UK nationals working in Europe. While the government has now stepped away from plans to impose an overnight cut-off on free movement on October 31, uncertainty remains.
“We are concerned that UK nationals working in the EEA have very little clarity on their status in the event of a No-Deal Brexit as this will depend on the position taken by each of the EU 27 separately. Furthermore, the Government’s white paper, with its focus on Tier 2 employed status, fails to consider the loss of EU self-employed contractors to the domestic workforce.
“EU citizens living and working in the UK can now apply for the Settlement Scheme, while those arriving between Brexit day and the end of 2020 will be able to apply for temporary leave to remain. However, despite these mechanisms being in place, staffing firms and employers are left with the challenges of reassuring and supporting existing European workers and encouraging EU candidates to come to the UK at this uncertain time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel