DATA experts were left out of early talks on sex and gender census questions, documents show.
The progress of legislation on the vital survey, which included a public consultation, has been marked by fierce debate between some women’s groups and transgender organisations on the way the data is collected.
While transgender groups say the people they represent must not be required to answer in accordance with their biological sex, opponents like For Women Scotland say failure to collect this data could skew service provision and threaten provisions for females.
Though the Scottish Parliament has voted to include a mandatory male-female sex question and voluntary transgender status section, final guidance on the census has yet to be approved and calls from both sides continue.
READ MORE: Health charities warn Scottish Government over GRA reform delay
A three-day protest was held at Holyrood by the Scottish Trans Alliance (STA) earlier this month.
It comes months after the Parliament’s cross-party Culture, Tourism and External Affairs Committee raised concerns about the way work on the census had been conducted, citing a lack of consultation with women’s groups, language conflating sex and gender, and a lack of definition around gender identity.
Now a Freedom of Information Request indicates that officials did not meet with independent statisticians or other users of census data in the early question development phase.
Responding to the inquiry, government body National Records of Scotland identified meetings between officials and groups advocating change, including Equality Network, STA, Stonewall Scotland and LGBT Health prior to the introduction of draft legislation. No such meetings with statisticians were identified.
READ MORE: A five-step guide to preventing a policy headache like GRA
However, the response did include a list of talks with a wider range of groups in recent months.
Edinburgh-based policy analysis collective Murray Blackburn Mackenzie (MBM), which is critical of gender self-identification in the census, said the Scottish Government “needs to engage more fully” with researchers and those who use census data.
In a blog post, the organisation linked the issue to the consideration of changes to the Gender Recognition Act. That was put on hold in the summer, though Equalities Secretary Shirley-Ann Somerville said the SNP administration “remains committed” to reform.
MBM said: “The census is not the appropriate vehicle to either pre-empt legal reform on gender self-identification, or to set legal precedents.
“If we lose count of sex as a biological category, we will also lose our ability to chart and address sex-based discrimination.”
STA’s James Morton said the mandatory sex question could threaten trans equality in “our use of services including the NHS and education”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel