NEW rules could force internet companies to remove content that promotes terrorism within an hour of them being informed.
The European Parliament’s civil liberties committee has already backed the parliament’s position and MEPs could start negotiations shortly with EU member states on the regulations.
Under them, EU countries would have to designate a competent authority and tell the European Commission, which would then publish a list with all the relevant bodies.
When these authorities flag terrorist content, a removal order would be sent to the internet platforms, which would have one hour to delete it or disable access to it in all EU member states.
There are also proposals to help smaller platforms – companies which have never received a removal order would be contacted 12 hours before their first order, when they would be given information on procedures and deadlines.
MEPs have also insisted that internet companies hosting content uploaded by users, such as Facebook or YouTube, should not be obliged to proactively identify terrorist content, something that these platforms claim would be a heavy burden for them.
Monitoring the information or actively seeking facts indicating illegal activity should be the responsibility of the competent national authority, they say.
While they want to to boost public security, they say they are also keen to protect free speech and press freedom.
Under the measures, which were backed by the parliament in April, internet companies could face penalties of up to 4% of their turnover if there are persistent breaches .
The Parliament’s rapporteur for the proposal, Daniel Dalton, said then: “There is clearly a problem with terrorist material circulating unchecked on the internet for too long.
“This propaganda can be linked to actual terrorist incidents and national authorities must be able to act decisively.
“Any new legislation must be practical and proportionate if we are to safeguard free speech.
“Without a fair process, there is a risk that too much content would be removed, as businesses would understandably take a ‘safety first’ approach to defend themselves.
“It also absolutely cannot lead to a general monitoring of content by the back door.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here