EDUCATION Secretary John Swinney has hailed improved “autonomy” for Scottish head teachers after results of a Government survey were released.
Some 88% of head teachers responding to a survey carried out in June said they had the freedom to design the senior phase for pupils.
However, almost three-quarters of head teachers have said timetabling pressures affect their ability to meet the needs of young people in the later years of high school, according to a survey.
Swinney said: “Almost nine out of 10 head teachers say they have the autonomy to determine the senior phase in their school. This demonstrates that our focus on empowering schools is working and that schools are making decisions about how best to meet the needs and aspirations of their pupils.”
The study also asked teachers to list factors they believe constrain their ability to develop a senior phase that meets the needs of pupils.
Some 74% suggested timing was an issue, while 57% of respondents cited the availability of supply teachers. Constraints on resources available to head teachers were listed by 66% and the inability to find appropriate partners to help deliver the senior phase was mentioned by 48%.
Commenting, Scottish Labour’s Iain Gray said: “It’s time for Swinney to give our schools the resources they need to allow all pupils to succeed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here