JEREMY Corbyn survived a Labour revolt over Brexit as the party's conference backed his policy of remaining neutral until after a General Election – but the First Minister accused him of "an abdication of leadership".
The Labour leader has promised that a government he leads will negotiate a new Brexit deal and put it to a referendum but he has resisted calls to say how the party should campaign in that public vote.
Delegates at the conference in Brighton backed a statement setting out his position and broke out into a chorus of "oh, Jeremy Corbyn" after the result of the vote was announced.
In chaotic scenes, the conference then rejected a motion which would have called on Labour to come out in support of Remain now rather than waiting until after an election.
The result is a boost for Corbyn, who has argued that Labour should go into the expected General Election without making a decision on how it should campaign on the referendum his party has promised within six months of taking office.
A decision on how the party would campaign in the referendum would be taken at a subsequent special conference.
The vote came after shadow cabinet ministers Emily Thornberry and Sir Keir Starmer both used their keynote conference speeches to say they would back Remain.
Responding to the result, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeted: "Labour rejects a clear pro Remain position and instead stays firmly perched on the Brexit fence. An abdication of leadership.
"It beggars belief - from a practical and principled point of view - that Corbyn thinks he can go through a General Election without saying if he backs Remain or Leave. @theSNP position is unequivocally #stopBrexit"
After delegates backed a statement from the ruling National Executive Committee in favour of Corbyn's position, a vote followed on composite 13 – which called for Labour to "campaign energetically" for a second referendum and to stay in the EU in such a public vote.
It was announced this motion was defeated following a show of hands among delegates allowed to vote.
Wendy Nichols, who was chairing the afternoon session of Labour conference, said there was disagreement in the group on stage looking at proceedings.
As delegates cast their votes, the chairwoman Nichols could be seen having a discussion with Labour general secretary Jennie Formby.
Announcing the result, Nichols said: "Sorry I thought it was one way... and Jennie said something else, so.
"Yes, that was lost."
Further confusion followed, with Nichols reiterating the motion was rejected despite appeals for a formal card vote by some members.
Andrew Lewin, of the Remain Labour campaign, said the party now faced going into a General Election without a clear position.
He said: "We are going to be unable to answer the question 'are you for Remain or Leave'.
"Obviously, lots of good people and senior people like Keir Starmer, Emily Thornberry etc. are going to say individually, but that's not what the public will see.
"The public will see the leader – and therefore by definition a party – that can't make its mind up and I think that will be really damaging."
SNP Europe and foreign affairs spokesman Stephen Gethins said: "Jeremy Corbyn is stuck firmly on the fence, refusing to come down – and today's votes show the rest of the Labour Party is happy to stay there. This is a real abdication of leadership.
"It beggars belief that more than three years after the EU referendum, and knowing the damage Brexit will do, Labour is still arguing over its position."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel