THE World Health Organisation (WHO) has issued a statement raising questions about whether Tanzania is covering up possible cases of Ebola.
The disease is a significant cause for concern during a regional outbreak that has been declared a rare global health emergency.
The statement says Tanzania’s government “despite several requests” has not shared its clinical data, the results of its investigations or the possible contacts of a number of patients with Ebola-like symptoms. It would be the first Ebola cases in the East African country but Tanzania’s government says there are none.
The United Nations health agency says it was made aware on September 10 of the death in Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam, of a patient suspected to have Ebola. A day later, it received unofficial reports that an Ebola test had come back positive.
On Thursday, it received unofficial reports that a contact of the patient, who had travelled widely in the country, was sick and in hospital. A rapid response is crucial in containing Ebola, which can be fatal in up to 90% of cases and is most often spread by close contact with bodily fluids of people exhibiting symptoms or with contaminated objects.
The WHO statement said the lack of information from Tanzania made it difficult to assess potential risks.
The Ebola outbreak based in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo has infected more than people and killed nearly 2000 of them.
A few cases have been confirmed in Uganda as well, and other neighbouring countries have been preparing for the outbreak’s possible spread. Last Monday, the US health and human services secretary, Alex Azar, told reporters in Uganda that he and others were “very concerned about the lack of transparency” in Tanzania.
Critics have shown increasing alarm as Tanzanian President John Magufuli’s government has restricted access to key information and cracked down on perceived dissent.
Politicians recently approved an amendment to make it a crime to distribute information not sanctioned by the government or which contradicts the government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here