I love chocolate, but chocolate doesn’t love wine. It coats the palate, making it difficult for the delicate flavours and nuances of the beverage to get to your tastebuds. You can waste many a pricey glass by experimenting with the wrong style of wine to match a rich chocolate mousse or a nice slice of Black Forest gateaux. Many dishes benefit from being paired with a wine that echoes the main flavours of the food. However, wines with chocolatey notes tend to be big, bold and dry and will not go with your dessert.
So, don’t be drawn in to trying a bottle of South African Chocolate Block (a lovely blend by Boekenhoutskloof), or the delicious Chocolate Box Shiraz from Australia with pudding. That’s not what they’re for. Instead, try either one with a good hearty stew before the dessert even sees the dinner table. Both are available from Inverarity One to One. The Block is £17.99, and the Box is £13.49. They are both occasionally available in magnum format (equivalent to two bottles) which can sometimes last twice as long as a bottle. And they look great on the dinner table.
Once you’ve finished the stew, you can turn your attention to the wine to go with the chocolate based pudding. Remember, it should be at least as sweet as the dish with a balancing acidity and a healthy thwack of alcohol. Thwack is a technical wine term.
Muscat should be your go-to bottle. An Australian liqueur muscat will go with the richest desserts, while a vin doux naturel such as Muscat de Beaumes de Venise will cover all of the mid-weight food options.
Muscat de Beaumes de Venise Carte Or (Waitrose, £7.99 for a half bottle). This is a beautifully balanced sweet wine bottled at 15% ABV (alcohol by volume).
Campbell’s Rutherglen Muscat (Waitrose, £12.99 for a half bottle). This wonderfully rich wine will partner everything up to and including Death by Chocolate cake. It weighs in at 17.5% ABV and is best served lightly chilled. It also works with the cheeseboard, or simply sipped at the end of the night as a digestif.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here