ALEX Salmond has said he would not have held Scotland's vote on independence in 2014 if he had known Boris Johnson would become Prime Minister and that the UK would be facing the prospect of a hard Brexit.
The former First Minister said he would have delayed the vote, suggesting this would have resulted in at least 60% of people in Scotland backing independence.
Salmond spoke out on the fifth anniversary of the independence referendum, when Scots voted by 55% to 45% to stay in the UK.
Within hours of the result being confirmed, Mr Salmond announced he was stepping down as both SNP leader and First Minister.
Marking the anniversary of the referendum, he said that "in reality" the 2014 vote was needed for Scotland to "experience the fundamental shift of opinion".
As a result, he said the focus should be "on the opportunity still to come" rather than "what might have been".
In a series of tweets, Salmond said: "If I had but known 5 years ago that @BorisJohnson would become Prime Minister and Britain would be poised on the brink of a hard #Brexit then I would have delayed the Scottish referendum and now looked forward to a 60% plus Yes vote.
"In reality, it is probably the case that #Scotland had to experience the fundamental shift of opinion in our first referendum before acting decisively to seize the day next time around.
"Therefore on this fifth anniversary we should focus not on what might have been but on the opportunity still to come."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel